<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software and Business Method Patents Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattlepatents.com/2008/11/software-and-business-method-patents-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattlepatents.com/2008/11/software-and-business-method-patents-update/</link>
	<description>Patent law updates from Seattle-based Axios Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prediction: Supreme Court to embrace software patents</title>
		<link>http://seattlepatents.com/2008/11/software-and-business-method-patents-update/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Prediction: Supreme Court to embrace software patents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattlepatents.com/?p=25#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] year, Axios&#8217;s managing partner, Adam Philipp, cautioned that Bilski hardly spelled the demise of software patents. And now I’m predicting that the Supreme Court is about to overturn Bilski and rule conclusively [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, Axios&#8217;s managing partner, Adam Philipp, cautioned that Bilski hardly spelled the demise of software patents. And now I’m predicting that the Supreme Court is about to overturn Bilski and rule conclusively [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accenture asks the Supreme Court to hear Bilski</title>
		<link>http://seattlepatents.com/2008/11/software-and-business-method-patents-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Accenture asks the Supreme Court to hear Bilski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattlepatents.com/?p=25#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] existing law on the patentability of method claims. Despite some commentary to the contrary, Bilski hardly outlawed software patents, but it certainly put &#8220;pure&#8221; method patents at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existing law on the patentability of method claims. Despite some commentary to the contrary, Bilski hardly outlawed software patents, but it certainly put &#8220;pure&#8221; method patents at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
